Burden of Proof 
for 
Physics of Subspace Geometry Theory

By David Butterworth 
Lulu.com – Self Publishing 
Text available under the Creative Common Attribution / NonCommercial. CC BY -NC 

This book provides a philosophic burden of proof for the subspace model of the universe.  The model consists of a geometrical explanation of the forces of gravity, electromagnetic and nuclear based simply upon object to object interactions the details of which are given in the book “Physics of Subspace Geometry“.
This burden of proof consists of a number of sentences which are either axioms or derived from the preceding sentences to provide the details for this proof. Here the aim is not to explore the strange or unusual results from experiments but to redefine the basic concepts, ones that were usually defined by the word “given“. This is a redefinition on how we view the universe and ourselves.

Premise #1: An object is defined as an element of the domain of reality
Premise #2: A state is defined as an object’s condition 
Premise #3: A nothing object is defined as the object with a Null State condition
Premise #4: A something object is defined as having a state opposite of nothing 
We start the investigation with these four premises. The domain of reality is simply the model of the universe that we are trying to understand. And it is assumed that this model has elements in other words that it is understandable.  If it is understandable then an object is an element and it has a state. In the number universe an object is a number (element) and it has a value.  So the first separation is between nothing and something. This is the simplest of all the investigation steps.

Therefore Conclusion #1:  An object can not be something and nothing
Reason: By classical logic’s law of non-contradiction (contradictory statements cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time)
Nothing doesn’t contains something and is not a part of something. Something does not contain nothing and is not a part of nothing. The total isolation of something and nothing is critical for this burden of proof.

Premise #5: Awareness is defined as a state that is not the Null State
This awareness is something that won‘t be described until later. This is the essence of  something. In the number theory it is the same as having a non-zero value. 

Therefore Conclusion #2: A something object has awareness 
Therefore Conclusion #3: A nothing object does not have awareness
Reason: From Premises #2 and #5
Simply something has awareness that it is not nothing. But nothing is nothing.

Premise #6: Real things are defined as multiple somethings objects
Premise #7: Real things must be unique 
Premise #8: Real things can interact 
To have multiple somethings that are elements of the domain of reality means that there must exists some type of identity process. Otherwise these multiple elements would actually be the same element. And this identity process could just exist in the real things themselves giving them uniqueness and interactions.   

Therefore Conclusion #4: Awareness has state properties of Uniqueness 
Therefore Conclusion #5: Awareness has state properties of Interactions 
Reason: Real things are something objects that have states and these states are states of awareness
Working our way towards the universe I am stating that real things interact without saying what the interactions are. And I am also saying that all of these real things must be unique.

Premise #9: Non-real things are defined as multiple nothing objects
Premise #10: Non-real things must be unique from each other
Premise #11: Non-real  things can interact with each other
These are provided for completeness. If there are multiple somethings then there may be multiple nothings. 

Therefore Conclusion #6: There are no Non-real things 
Reason: None real things only have one state which is the Null state. So they can not be unique and they can not interact
There is nothing unique about non-real things. And to have multiple nothings requires uniqueness. There is nothing but there are no non-real things.

Premise #12: Space is defined as an property of awareness 
Premise #13: Uniqueness is the space awareness occupies
Premise #14: Interactions is the space awareness changes
Space is a new definition required to separate multiple real things. Each real thing is unique by the space that it occupies.  

Therefore Conclusion #7: Real things can not be single points in space
Reason: A point in space has no size so the awareness can not be unique

Therefore Conclusion #8: Real thing’s awareness must exist over space 
Reason: Uniqueness is the space real things occupy. By classical logic’s law of non-contradiction (contradictory statements cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time)

Therefore Conclusion #9: Multiple real things can not occupy the same space
Reason: Occupying the same space violates the awareness uniqueness

Therefore Conclusion #10: Nothing does not exist over space
Reason: Nothing does not have awareness and space is a property of awareness

Premise #15: Time is defined as an property of awareness 
Premise #16: Uniqueness is also the time awareness occupies
Premise #17: Interactions is also the time awareness changes
Time is another new definition required by a dynamic model. Here time is viewed as changes in awareness, the something that is contained in real things. Nothing about movement, speed of light, or even if time is common for all real things are stated at this time.

Therefore Conclusion #11: Awareness change is instantaneous across the space of a real thing 
Reason: Uniqueness is defined as the space, time that awareness occupies. 
 
Therefore Conclusion #12: Nothing does not exist over time
Reason: Nothing does not have awareness and time is a property of awareness

Premise #18: Energy is defined as awareness across the space, time of a real thing
Premise #19: Energy flows and has a wavelength and frequency (space & time)

Therefore Conclusion #14: Real things in regular space contain no energy 
Reason: Instantiates change is the same thing as infinite speed; the wavelength = 0
Keeping Real things as unique real things eliminates the concept of internal energies. However the universe we are modeling things have internal energies. To solve this dilemma requires the use of singularity space. This is 1/R space that is larger on the insides than on the outsides. So energy could exist from the center singularity point to the edge of the space. However instantaneous changes at infinite speeds over an infinite distance is a mathematically undefined operation. To define this as the speed of light requires another premise.

Premise #20: Instantaneous changes at infinite speeds over an infinite distance in singularity space is the speed of light in regular space.

Therefore Conclusion #15: Real things in singularity space have energy and awareness
Reason: Real things in singularity space have an infinite distance for instantaneous changes of existence.
This is the definition of a subspace. 

Therefore Conclusion #16: Energy is evenly distributed at the edges around the edge of the real things.
Reason: Geometrically the singularity point exists somewhere within the real thing. The energy anyplace along the edge is inversely proportional to the distance between the singularity point and the edge. 
We have actually painted ourselves in the corner here when we said that singularity spaces exist in real space. We just used this notion of flat space as the distance between a real things singularity point and its edge. If our notion of flat space changes then our definition of energy would change as well. If a real thing at rest (non-moving) then its singularity point would be in the center. If it is moving then its singularity point would be off center. The different viewpoints is due to the different notions of flat space. Flat space does not exist as a universal axiom, it is derived from the singularity spaces.  All of this is shown in the book “Physics of Subspace Geometry“.

Premise #21: Force is defined as the interactions of real things 

Therefore Conclusion #17: The effect results in a change in energy of the things affected
Reason: Interactions are a change in space and time of the real things

Therefore Conclusion #18: The effect must be equal for affected real things
Reason: All things being equal the definition of the substance of real things are the same

Therefore Conclusion #19: Forces are felt at the edge of the awareness of real things
Reason: The energy is evident at the edge of the real things.

Therefore Conclusion #20: Changes in energy due to a force are redistributed around a real thing
Reason: A change in energy results in a change in the distance of the singularity point and the area where the force is applied.  This movement of the singularity point results in a change in energy around the object. 
This also causes movement as shown in the book “Physics of Subspace Geometry“.

Premise #22: Universe is defined as where real things interact with each other

Therefore Conclusion #21: All real things touch the universe to be part of it
Reason: All forces occur at the edge of real things and all forces occur (interactions) in the universe.

Therefore Conclusion #22: Shared awareness only exists in the universe (space)
Reason: Changes to awareness occur due to forces which exists in the universe.

Premise #23: Smear is defined as adding a new dimension to real things 
Premise #24: Energy distribution must remain continuous

Therefore Conclusion #25: Dimensions can only be added by another real thing
Reason: Singularities that exist in more than one dimension can react with other subspaces that exists in other dimensions. 
Only the direction of the force needs to be equal; of the same dimension. However the effect is felt by the change in the singularity point through out the real thing object. Which means there is a change in force along the surface of the real object. What balances this force? It must be the other real thing even if it does not exist in this dimension.

Premise #25: Matter is defined as objects made out of two real things
The details of this model is given in the book “Physics of Subspace Geometry“. Here two subspaces interact smearing one into a line (fourth dimensional axis) and one into a circle. Gravity, electrical magnetic, nuclear forces are all described from this simple model.
Gravity is defined by the equation [1- (4GM)/RC2] d(CT)2 - dR2 = dS2 
Electrical force is generated from the outer ring subspace upon other objects defined by the equation F = (nhc)/2r2 = (nq2)/2r2 
Magnetic force is also generated from the outer ring subspace and is due to the angle of the subspace in the direction of travel.
Nuclear force is due to Riemann Curvature of gravity.
Particle vs. Wave definition occurs due to the fourth dimensional axis

Premise #26: Light is defined as objects made out of two real things
The details of this model is given in the book “Physics of Subspace Geometry“. Here two subspaces interact smearing themselves into a double helix. The description of electrical magnetic interactions are described in this model.

Premise #27: This model satisfies the benchmarks of Newton’s, Einstein’s, Maxwell’s, Schrodinger’s, and Dirac’s laws, theories and equations. 
The details are given in the book “Little Book Open - Securing a Narrow Clear Passage to the Future.”

The books referenced are given for free at 
https://sites.google.com/site/subspacescience/